Jul 24
red and black arrow

Getting the Most out of Biodiesel

With the price of gas on the steady incline, more consumers have taken interest in alternative fuels, even going as far as purchasing vehicles specifically made to support them. Biodiesel is one such fuel that powers vehicles like the 2005 Volkswagen TDI and the 2005 Dodge RAM 2500 Pickup. While this domestically produced, renewable fuel solution is supposed to be safer for the environment, many questions have been raised about its effectiveness. Consumers have been warned that it will leave behind deposits from petrodiesel. These deposits can then clog the fuel filter which may eventually prevent the vehicle from running.According to one consumer, B20 is the preferred choice over B100 (100% biodiesel) which often requires specific engine modifications to prevent maintenance and performance issues. The consumer went on to explain that B20 even blended nicely with the B99 he put into the tank previously, giving great performance and mileage. Although the jury is still out on the overall efficiency of this alternative fuel, its good to know that some of us are enjoying the benefits.

5 px

Jul 3
red and black arrow

1987 Mustang 110 MPG

Doug Pelmear is an engineer from Ohio with a valuable secret under the hood of his 1987 Ford Mustang. This 400 horsepower muscle car does 0-60 in under 3 seconds and a top speed of about 180 MPH. Even more amazing, the car gets 110 MPG.The public hasn’t been allowed to peek under the hood just yet. Pelmear is waiting for a few patents to come in before releasing details of this green engineering miracle.

There has been independent verification according to OzarksFirst. The claims have been verified by Rocket Ventures in Toledo, Ohio.

Pelmear is entering his car in the Progressive Automotive X Prize competition. He could win the $10 million, but the real potential is in using the technology in the large cars and SUV’s that Americans crave. Soon we all may be thanking Pelmear for his remarkable engineering feat.

5 px

Jun 25
red and black arrow

Green?

Oil prices are through the roof and the planet is getting hotter. We are facing an energy crisis and many truckers, and other professional drivers, have been forced to stay parked until the prices come down.

With no relief in sight a lot of “green” advocates are jumping on the biodiesel bandwagon. After all it’s a cheaper, cleaner burning fuel and most diesel engines need little or no modifications to start using it*. However, recent studies suggest that biodiesel might not be the “green” solution many are hoping for.

Biodiesel is heralded as an alternative, cleaner burning cousin to diesel. It’s made through the processing of various forms of vegetable oil. It is then blended with conventional diesel or used alone. Biodiesel can be manufactured using waste vegetable oils, like those thrown out by fast-food restaurants. However, a rising demand has lead to the cultivation of farmland for the sole purpose of growing crops for the manufacture of biodiesel fuel.

Approved and toted as a “clean air” fuel, even a 20% biodiesel mix creates a significant reduction in CO2 emissions. The way biodiesel burns is not a point of concern. The way that it is currently being produced, may raise an environmentalist eyebrow or two.

The well respected Science magazine released two reports this year calling attention to the destruction of essential rain forest and other vital natural habitats and eco-systems due to the increased demand for palm, soy and other vegetable oils for bio-diesel production. (Report 1) (Report 2)

These studies warn that biodiesel may not be as green as it seems here’s why:

More Green House Gases
According to the studies the process of clearing grasslands, rain forests, and other land for farming actually releases more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than would be saved by the fuel that the land produces. Not to mention the natural CO2 absorption that is stopped when this dense growth is destroyed. Considering farm land absorbs less CO2 and produces less oxygen than the rain forest or other growth it replaces, the farming and production of oils for bio-fuel arguably does more to harm the environment than to help it.

Of course this “clearing” of farmland for bio-fuels also lends to other problems:

Killing Endangered Species
In Borneo, by 2020 most of the rain forest will be gone. It is home to thousands of unique species of insect and animals, including the endangered Sumatra and Borneo Orangutan, the Sumatra Tiger, Asian Elephant and Sumatran Rhinoceros. In fact the conditions are so dire in Indonesia and Borneo it is estimated that if we continue at the current rate of destruction, the Orangutan will be extinct in 10 years. (www.redape.org)

Creating Dead Zones In the Gulf of Mexico
A “Dead Zone” is an oxygen starved patch in the ocean. These “Dead Zones” occur all around the world and are caused by decomposing algae which depletes the oxygen and suffocates marine life. According to the June edition of National Geographic, the main cause of the rise in “Dead Zones” in the Gulf of Mexico is runoff of fertilizer that comes down the Mississippi. With farmers growing more corn for bio-fuels, more fertilizer is being used resulting in the death of marine life.

The World Food Crisis

The world is already experiencing a global food shortage. The price of wheat has doubled in the last year, and palm, soy, and other food prices are rising across the board. If more crops are grown for fuel less will be grown for food. Tearing down the rain forest for farmland is bad enough, millions of starving people is even worse.

By the end of this year, Europe wants all diesel fuel to contain 5% biodiesel. By 2012 20% of all diesel fuel must be biodiesel. The only way the world’s farmers can keep up with rising demands is to clear more land for farming.

The allure of cheaper, cleaner burning fuels can cause many uninformed “greenies” to applaud the advantages of biodiesel fuel; however there is one buzzword that must be remembered in any conversation about new energy: sustainability.

The facts are clear. We cannot continue to abuse the ecosystem to support our accustomed lifestyle. Fortunately, world leadership is starting to take notice, and people are finally starting to look for new sustainable energy answers. Unfortunately, however, bio-diesel may not be the perfect solution everyone was hoping for.

(*Note: bio-diesel is a solvent and will eat your rubber fuel lines and seals, older vehicles are more susceptible to this possibility. Make sure your fuel lines are non-rubber if you plan to use biodiesel.)

5 px

Jun 7
red and black arrow

LiberalTrucker contributed this post for Masslogics Trucking News. The trucking industry is taking a beating not only from high prices of diesel but also from the environmentalists and health fanatics.

Trucks have been the backbone of the American transport industry. From the very beginning, trucks have played an important role in the transport of goods across the country. There are 1000’s of trucks on almost every highway in the nation. While essential and ubiquitous, they have also earned a less desireable reputation. They crowd the roads, congest the highways, are involved in accidents, and pollute the environment.

Trucks burn diesel fuel causing emission of dangerous particles which have health risks. In many parts if the country, these sulfur and nitrogen particles have been shown to worsen asthmatic attacks.

Before the Clean Air Act of 1970, the USA had no national emissions standards for either cars or trucks. With growing awareness of pollution from fuels, strict regulations, better engine technology, and reformulated gasoline were developed. These advances have significantly decreased the amount of pollution from vehicles over the last 3 decades. The EPA estimates that today’s automobile emits 75 – 90% less pollution for each mile driven than cars built before 1970.

The same goes for the newer heavy-duty trucks which have become more environmentally friendly. Today’s large trucks emit nearly 70% less nitrogen oxide and other particles compared to vehicles built in the 1980s.

However, there are still a fair number of older trucks still running around and the ARB has now taken significant steps to clean up the diesel churning trucks. Numerous regulations have been proposed to make it mandatory for trucks to clean up through retrofits or upgrading to newer vehicles

Hopefully, approving and executing regulations that will reduce diesel pollution from trucks will safeguard public health, meet federal air quality standards, and reduce cancer risks for everyone.

5 px